On 7/17/26 3:01 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> The first two labels only unwind a single regulator

Thanks for taking a look. Could you clarify whether this is a
correctness concern (e.g. the fallthrough from err_enable/err_set_load
into err_set_voltage not doing what you'd expect), or more a
structural/style preference (e.g. avoiding three chained labels in
favor of a different approach)? Happy to send a v2 once I understand
what you'd like changed.

Thanks,
Sailesh


On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 3:01 PM Konrad Dybcio
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 7/10/26 9:46 PM, Sailesh Nandanavanam wrote:
> > In q6v5_regulator_enable(), when any operation fails for regulator at
> > index 'i', the error cleanup path unconditionally calls
> > regulator_disable() starting from index 'i'. However, regulator 'i'
> > was never successfully enabled at this point, resulting in an
> > unbalanced disable.
> >
> > There are three distinct failure points:
> > - regulator_set_voltage() failure: voltage was never set, load was
> > never set, regulator was never enabled.
> > - regulator_set_load() failure: voltage was set, but regulator was
> > never enabled.
> > - regulator_enable() failure: voltage and load were set, but
> > regulator was never enabled.
> >
> > Fix this by introducing three separate error labels to handle each
> > failure point correctly. For the failing regulator at index 'i',
> > only reset the resources that were actually configured, without
> > calling regulator_disable(). Then roll back all previously enabled
> > regulators using 'i--' in the for loop initializer to skip the
> > never-enabled regulator.
> >
> > Fixes: 19f902b53b47 ("remoteproc: qcom: Initialize and enable proxy and 
> > active regulators.")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Sailesh Nandanavanam <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > -err:
> > -     for (; i >= 0; i--) {
> > +err_enable:
> > +     if (regs[i].uA > 0)
> > +             regulator_set_load(regs[i].reg, 0);
> > +err_set_load:
> > +     if (regs[i].uV > 0)
> > +             regulator_set_voltage(regs[i].reg, 0, INT_MAX);
>
> The first two labels only unwind a single regulator
>
> Konrad

Reply via email to