On 21/07/2026 11:42, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 26-07-21 11:22:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 03:24:01PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote: >>> + - if: >>> + properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + enum: >>> + - qcom,eliza-cdsp-pas >>> + then: >>> + properties: >>> + power-domains: >>> + items: >>> + - description: CX power domain >>> + - description: MX power domain >>> + - description: NSP power domain >>> + power-domain-names: >>> + items: >>> + - const: cx >>> + - const: mx >>> + - const: nsp >> >> No, do not grow the ifs. Eliza belongs to class of SM8750, so I don't >> get why it was and it is being added here. > > I'm assuming you meant SM8550 here, right?
The SM8550 binding file, but Eliza is SM8750-based in general thus I would expect it will be documented along SM8750. > > Why does Eliza belong to SM8750 but Milos doesn't? I don't know about Milos, but Eliza is variant of SM8750, right? > > Was Milos also a mistake? This I did not verify. Best regards, Krzysztof
