On July 22, 2026 1:22:04 PM PDT, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: >On 7/22/26 13:18, Yeoreum Yun wrote: >> Sorry. But do you mean check with cpu_feature_enabled() not with >> boot_cpu_has()? >> IIRC, the boot_cpu_has() doesn't use the DISABLE_MASK_BIT_SET() but >> uses REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET() and I don't expect it wouldn't make >> an optimisation to constant check which is contrast to >> DISABLE_MASK_BIT_SET(). > >Ahh, yes. I forgot about that nuance! Moving to cpu_feature_enabled() >would be great!
It is supposed to. That's the point of the required mask.
