On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 11:19 PM Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2026-07-27 05:30:43+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Well, at other places we already have typeof(arg) which is exactly the > > same, more explicit, and doesn't come with such restrictions, so I'd > > rather suggest we use it instead. > > Agreed.
Noted, I'll use __typeof__() in the next version. -- Ammar Faizi

