On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 11:19 PM Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2026-07-27 05:30:43+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Well, at other places we already have typeof(arg) which is exactly the
> > same, more explicit, and doesn't come with such restrictions, so I'd
> > rather suggest we use it instead.
>
> Agreed.

Noted, I'll use __typeof__() in the next version.

-- 
Ammar Faizi

Reply via email to