On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: > No module code calls these functions directly. Seems it was always the > case. Remove the exports. > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Which reminds me... Are you guys interested in taking the kfree_rcu() test code from kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c? See for example the kfree_rcu_test module parameter. Thanx, Paul > --- > Based on slab/for-7.3/kfree_rcu_nolock > --- > mm/slab_common.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c > index 6750dfa27367..cd155ffc2762 100644 > --- a/mm/slab_common.c > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c > @@ -1329,14 +1329,12 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void) > deferred_work_barrier(); > rcu_barrier(); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier); > > void kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) > { > deferred_work_barrier(); > rcu_barrier(); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache); > > void __init kvfree_rcu_init(void) > { > @@ -2163,7 +2161,6 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void) > flush_all_rcu_sheaves(); > __kvfree_rcu_barrier(); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier); > > /** > * kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache - Wait for in-flight kvfree_rcu() calls on a > @@ -2186,7 +2183,6 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) > rcu_barrier(); > __kvfree_rcu_barrier(); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache); > > static unsigned long > kfree_rcu_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc) > > --- > base-commit: b01f6ed9ff0c4581fc669044fa5b82a93b4ef144 > change-id: 20260730-unexport-barriers-439b3f69f791 > >
