On 7/31/26 6:40 PM, Esteban Urrutia wrote: > On 7/31/26 12:28 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> Somehow I confabulated the generic compatible being present in the >> driver... I was trying to explain that >> >> And yes I didn't notice the 8350/8450 difference. But anyway, the >> resolution will be one of: >> >> // 8450 is fully compatible >> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", >> "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink", >> "qcom,pmic-glink" >> >> or >> >> // 8475 is special >> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", >> "qcom,pmic-glink" >> >> depending on what you believe is more correct. I think the first >> one fits better. > > Yes, I agree the first case fits better, but I believe there is also a > possible third case: > > // 8550 is fully compatible > "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", > "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", > "qcom,pmic-glink" > > The reason why I believe this is that I've found SM8475 to include some > elements such as eUSB or PHY sequences found in more recent SoCs such as > SM8550. > I guess that's the case since SM8475 is a respin, but I'm not sure.
pmic-glink provides three main services: - UCSI (Type-C) - altmode pin assignment notifications (also Type-C) - battmgr (battery/power supply) In that scope, I believe it's no different to 8450 Konrad
