On Fri Jul 31, 2026 at 5:34 PM BST, Alvin Sun wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > Thanks for taking a look! > > On 7/31/26 14:46, Miguel Ojeda wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 4:11 AM Alvin Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> base-commit: b7e5ac83cb16f7ffd11dc23736f84276602100ed >> Was this old tag used for some reason? > > That was an oversight on my part - I forgot to rebase onto the latest > tag before sending v9. The series is now based on v7.2-rc4. > >> >>> prerequisite-change-id: 20260519-miscdev-use-format-9ab7e83b1c11:v3 >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 405b334ff0d48ad350014f05a2321bdbaa025400 >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 604b631c81d5423f4ebb2e12ba2d22e9ce371bfc >>> prerequisite-patch-id: cb550d94cefe01920e0d3ced2b2bcbecd76f3907 >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3bc830839742591460cb86d9472c04f4686dc600 >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 571058244bc8c7088638d2e3225713011246c7e9 >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 347c5a3c6dbef9832bfce8419fc23e6e08ba477f >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3e202d988b56b88446f7535e90d3f00cf5f15701 >> Are all these actually needed? Some seem unrelated (some were already >> applied too). > > The prerequisites were just some import formatting changes that the > series depended on at the time. After rebasing onto v7.2-rc4, I was > able to drop all of them - the rebase was clean with no conflicts. > > I'll send v10 shortly.
If the patch applies cleanly then there's a no need to send a new version. Best, Gary > > Best regards, > Alvin > >> The only one that seems needed has Andreas' Acked-by, so >> I guess it is fine. >> >> (By the way, I will use this second message to take this chance to >> move the modules maintainers in the To: in case it helps, since I >> didn't do it in my previous message) >> >> Thanks! >> >> Cheers, >> Miguel
