A verifier-tracked spin lock provides implicit RCU protection while held.
Consequently, a kptr loaded from a lock-protected map value is marked
MEM_RCU.

process_spin_lock() invalidates non-owning references on unlock, but leaves
RCU-protected references intact. This is correct while another RCU context
remains active. However, for a sleepable program, releasing its final lock
can end the only RCU-protected context. The verifier then allows a MEM_RCU
pointer to be used after its protection has ended.

Invalidate RCU-protected references when a successful unlock changes
in_rcu_cs() from true to false. Non-sleepable programs remain in their
invocation-wide implicit RCU context, and an explicit RCU read-side section
continues to protect pointers across the unlock.

A task kptr retained across the final unlock can race with removal of the
map kptr and bpf_task_release(). This was confirmed to result in a
task_struct use-after-free in __bpf_get_task_stack().

Add a negative sleepable regression and positive non-sleepable and explicit
RCU controls.

Fixes: 5861d1e8dbc4 ("bpf: Allow bpf_spin_{lock,unlock} in sleepable progs")
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol
Assisted-by: ChatGPT:GPT-5.6-Pro
Signed-off-by: Ning Ding <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  5 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c     |  2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h   | 12 +++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c  | 24 ++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 91 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index fdc5fbb1f78c..aea9fdbbd33a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int acquire_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, 
int insn_idx, int par
 static int release_reference_nomark(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int id);
 static int release_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int id);
 static void invalidate_non_owning_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env);
+static void invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env);
 static bool in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env);
 static bool is_tracing_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type type);
 static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -7051,6 +7052,7 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, struct bpf_reg_state
                        return err;
                }
        } else {
+               bool was_in_rcu_cs;
                void *ptr;
                int type;
 
@@ -7078,10 +7080,13 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, struct bpf_reg_state
                        verbose(env, "%s_unlock cannot be out of order\n", 
lock_str);
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
+               was_in_rcu_cs = in_rcu_cs(env);
                if (release_lock_state(cur, type, reg->id, ptr)) {
                        verbose(env, "%s_unlock of different lock\n", lock_str);
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
+               if (was_in_rcu_cs && !in_rcu_cs(env))
+                       invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(env);
 
                invalidate_non_owning_refs(env);
        }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
index e6e95c1416e6..fbd7855712c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
@@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ static const char * const success_tests[] = {
        "test_task_from_pid_current",
        "test_task_from_pid_invalid",
        "task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked",
+       "task_kfunc_acquire_after_spin_unlock_non_sleepable",
+       "task_kfunc_acquire_after_spin_unlock_explicit_rcu",
        "test_task_kfunc_flavor_relo",
        "test_task_kfunc_flavor_relo_not_found",
 };
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
index e9c4fea7a4bb..052c9d0e3e2a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
@@ -20,6 +20,18 @@ struct {
        __uint(max_entries, 1);
 } __tasks_kfunc_map SEC(".maps");
 
+struct task_kptr_lock_value {
+       struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
+       struct task_struct __kptr * task;
+};
+
+struct {
+       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+       __type(key, int);
+       __type(value, struct task_kptr_lock_value);
+       __uint(max_entries, 1);
+} task_kptr_lock_map SEC(".maps");
+
 struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
 void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
 struct task_struct *bpf_task_from_pid(s32 pid) __ksym;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
index 8942b5478129..7a0c7ee95511 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
@@ -378,3 +378,27 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_in_map, struct task_struct 
*task, u64 clone_flag
 
        return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure __msg("R1 must be a rcu pointer")
+int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_after_final_spin_unlock)
+{
+       struct task_kptr_lock_value *v;
+       struct task_struct *task, *acquired;
+       int key = 0;
+
+       v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&task_kptr_lock_map, &key);
+       if (!v)
+               return 0;
+
+       bpf_spin_lock(&v->lock);
+       task = v->task;
+       bpf_spin_unlock(&v->lock);
+       if (!task)
+               return 0;
+
+       acquired = bpf_task_acquire(task);
+       if (acquired)
+               bpf_task_release(acquired);
+       return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
index d63a79ee33dc..2bab7634c9df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
 #include "../bpf_experimental.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
 #include "task_kfunc_common.h"
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -366,6 +367,53 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked, struct 
task_struct *task, u64 cl
        return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_after_spin_unlock_non_sleepable)
+{
+       struct task_kptr_lock_value *v;
+       struct task_struct *task, *acquired;
+       int key = 0;
+
+       v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&task_kptr_lock_map, &key);
+       if (!v)
+               return 0;
+
+       bpf_spin_lock(&v->lock);
+       task = v->task;
+       bpf_spin_unlock(&v->lock);
+       if (!task)
+               return 0;
+
+       acquired = bpf_task_acquire(task);
+       if (acquired)
+               bpf_task_release(acquired);
+       return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_after_spin_unlock_explicit_rcu)
+{
+       struct task_kptr_lock_value *v;
+       struct task_struct *task, *acquired;
+       int key = 0;
+
+       v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&task_kptr_lock_map, &key);
+       if (!v)
+               return 0;
+
+       bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+       bpf_spin_lock(&v->lock);
+       task = v->task;
+       bpf_spin_unlock(&v->lock);
+       if (task) {
+               acquired = bpf_task_acquire(task);
+               if (acquired)
+                       bpf_task_release(acquired);
+       }
+       bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+       return 0;
+}
+
 SEC("syscall")
 int test_task_from_vpid_current(const void *ctx)
 {
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to