On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 09:17:26AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 8/3/26 16:32, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 04:02:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > >> On 8/3/26 15:51, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > >>> > >>> As per commit message: > >>> > >>> This is laying the groundwork for eventually using anonymous page > >>> offsets > >>> as the index for all anonymous folios. > >>> > >>> No functional change intended. > >>> > >>> I cannot enable an effective change here, because if I did I'd break the > >>> kernel > >>> and introduce a bisection hazard. > >> > >> You can just throw in a patch that cleans that up and avoids messing with > >> confusing pgoff? > > > > You mean do a separate patch for this change? > > > > The existing code is already very confusing :) it becomes worse with the > > anon stuff added, hence the change. > > > > I will separate it out assuming this is what you mean? > > Right, if the vma_address_end() is not required in this patch (and does not > fall > under "track whether the page VMA mapped pgoff is anonymous"), just have it > in a > separate cleanup patch "prepare vma_address_end() for further changes" etc.
Cool, will do! > > -- > Cheers, > > David -- Cheers, Lorenzo
