On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 06:53:12AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 06:33:10PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> The effect is harmless in practice, as this only happens while the
> owning process (and thus the whole device) is dying, but the lockless
> write is inconsistent with the rest of the code.  Clear vq->worker under
> vq->mutex, like everyone else, so that all writers of vq->worker follow
> the same locking rule.
>
> This issue was found by Sashiko AI review.

Can you share a link to the review?

I don't know if it's common or not, but having the link in the commit or
after --- will help the reviewers.

+1.  FWIW, I've been using and encouraging the "standard" Reported-by+Closes, 
e.g.

   Reported-by: Sashiko Bot <[email protected]>
   Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]


Yeah, this makes a lot of sense to me! I'll encourage the same.

Thanks,
Stefano


Reply via email to