Hi,
thanks for continuing with this.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:37:42PM +0800, Tao Cui <[email protected]> wrote:
> +/* Trigger smoke test: second on same fd -> EBUSY; IRQ rejects "some". */
> +static int test_proc_triggers(const char *root)
> +{
> +     static const char *const resources[] = { "io", "memory", "cpu" };
> +     int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> +     int fd = -1;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     (void)root;

WTH?

> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < (int)ARRAY_SIZE(resources); i++) {

This (int) cast is quite uncommon, look around.

> +/* Induce deterministic CPU pressure (more hogs than CPUs). */
> +static int test_cgroup_trigger_fire(const char *root)
> +{
> +     char *cg = NULL, *cpupress = NULL;
> +     int fd = -1, ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> +     struct pollfd pfd;
> +     long ncpus, i;
> +     pid_t pid;
> +
> +     cg = cg_name(root, "psi_trigger_test");
> +     if (!cg)
> +             goto cleanup;
> +     if (cg_create(cg))
> +             goto cleanup;
> +
> +     cpupress = cg_control(cg, "cpu.pressure");
> +     if (!cpupress)
> +             goto cleanup;
> +     fd = open(cpupress, O_RDWR);
> +     if (fd < 0) {
> +             ksft_print_msg("open cpu.pressure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +             goto cleanup;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* 1us threshold in a 1s window: any cpu stall fires it. */
> +     errno = 0;
> +     if (write_trigger(fd, "some 1 1000000") <= 0) {
> +             ksft_print_msg("arming trigger failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +             goto cleanup;
> +     }

When I see this, could you increase the window size to 2000000 (so that
it has potential to run for unprivileged users)?

> +
> +     ncpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> +     if (ncpus <= 0)
> +             ncpus = 1;
> +
> +     pid = fork();
> +     if (pid < 0) {
> +             ksft_print_msg("fork: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +             goto cleanup;
> +     }
> +     if (pid == 0) {
> +             /* Enter the cgroup, then over-subscribe it with CPU hogs. */
> +             if (cg_enter_current(cg))
> +                     _exit(KSFT_FAIL);
> +             for (i = 0; i < ncpus; i++) {
> +                     if (fork() == 0) {
> +                             for (;;)
> +                                     asm volatile("" ::: "memory");
> +                             _exit(0);
> +                     }
> +             }
> +             for (;;)
> +                     asm volatile("" ::: "memory");  /* child is also a hog 
> */
> +             _exit(0);
> +     }

This part could be replaced with generalized hog_cpus_timed() from
test_cpu.c (after move to cgroup_util.c).

> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +     char root[PATH_MAX];
> +     int mempress_fd;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     (void)argc;

What's up with this?

> +
> +     ksft_print_header();
> +     ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(tests));
> +
> +     if (cg_find_unified_root(root, sizeof(root), NULL))
> +             ksft_exit_skip("cgroup v2 isn't mounted\n");
> +
> +     /* PSI must be enabled (CONFIG_PSI=y, not default-disabled). */
> +     mempress_fd = open("/proc/pressure/memory", O_RDONLY);
> +     if (mempress_fd < 0)
> +             ksft_exit_skip("PSI unavailable (CONFIG_PSI=n or psi=0)\n");
> +     close(mempress_fd);
> +
> +     if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.controllers", "memory"))
> +             ksft_exit_skip("memory controller isn't available\n");
> +     if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "memory"))
> +             if (cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory"))
> +                     ksft_exit_skip("failed to enable memory controller\n");

The memory controller is unnecessary now, right?


Regards,
Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to