From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

If acpi_dev_get_resources() returns overlapping I/O or memory resources,
the subsequent registration of a platform device will fail with -EBUSY
due to a resource conflict.  This is reported to happen on Acer Aspire
ES1-572 [1].

Avoid that by adjusting resources returned by acpi_dev_get_resources()
to eliminate partial overlaps between them.

This has not been regarded as necessary before because putting
overlapping resources into the _CRS of one device is really pointless,
but now that the issue has been reported to actually happen in the
field, it needs to be done.

Fixes: ab06eb920401 ("ACPI: scan: Register platform devices for fixed event 
buttons")
Reported-by: Julien <[email protected]>
Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/cajogg3z6ljpdsdpnbxajgy8_wqxfhybrxe4eiurzf3kpu5a...@mail.gmail.com/
 [1]
Cc: All applicable <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
---

v1 -> v2:
   * Add the expanded resource instead of and not in addition to the other
     overlapping one (Sashiko)

---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
@@ -71,6 +71,47 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_platfo
        .notifier_call = acpi_platform_device_remove_notify,
 };
 
+static unsigned int acpi_platform_adjust_resources(struct acpi_device *adev,
+                                                  struct resource *new_res,
+                                                  struct resource *resources,
+                                                  unsigned int count)
+{
+       unsigned int i;
+
+       if (!(new_res->flags & (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM)))
+               return count;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < count; ) {
+               struct resource *res = &resources[i];
+
+               if (resource_type(new_res) != resource_type(res) ||
+                   !resource_overlaps(new_res, res)) {
+                       i++;
+                       continue;
+               }
+
+               dev_info(&adev->dev, "Adjusting %pR for %pR\n", new_res, res);
+               /*
+                * Extend the new resource to include the one that has been 
processed
+                * already.
+                */
+               if (res->start < new_res->start)
+                       new_res->start = res->start;
+
+               if (res->end > new_res->end)
+                       new_res->end = res->end;
+
+               /*
+                * Eliminate the previously processed resource that has
+                * triggered the adjustment because it is not necessary any
+                * more.
+                */
+               memmove(res, res + 1, (--count - i) * sizeof(*res));
+       }
+
+       return count;
+}
+
 static void acpi_platform_fill_resource(struct acpi_device *adev,
        const struct resource *src, struct resource *dest)
 {
@@ -151,10 +192,14 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_plat
                                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
                        }
                        count = 0;
-                       list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node)
+                       list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) {
+                               count = acpi_platform_adjust_resources(adev,
+                                                                      
rentry->res,
+                                                                      
resources,
+                                                                      count);
                                acpi_platform_fill_resource(adev, rentry->res,
                                                            
&resources[count++]);
-
+                       }
                        acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
                }
        }




Reply via email to