Thanks, this is a much simpler solution, I will respin accordingly. > On Aug 7, 2026, at 20:39, Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Fan, > > While I may agree on the problem, I don't like the solution. It is > overly complex. If the problem is the fact that we might queue works, > what about disable_work[_sync]() ? > > Thanks, > Miquèl
- [PATCH] ieee802154: cc2520: fix FIFOP work use-after-free Fan Wu
- Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: cc2520: fix FIFOP work use-afte... Miquel Raynal
- Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: cc2520: fix FIFOP work use-... Fan Wu

