On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 09:17:09AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 6:18 AM Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/215547 > Thanks. > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671 was closed as > invalid pointing to the same commit in llvm. What's going on here? > Where's the corresponding feature request for GCC? TBH I'd missed that that got closed, basically it's what's in the report there - the GCC people really dislike the idea of adding landing pads and want to see veneers added by the linker to fix up issues where they're missing. > At the least, I could imagine there being a `-fno-omit-bti-pads` or > whatever for the kernel to opt into this behavior. That would be useful.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
