On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 at 00:49, Eric Biggers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:52:36AM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: > > From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> > > > > Instead of requiring -o inlinecrypt to enable inline encryption, allow > > having s_cop->has_per_extent_encryption to indicate that this file > > system supports inline encryption. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > v5: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ba0289bf103653d5d98ef576756c9a2a66192865.1706116485.git.jo...@toxicpanda.com/ > > * No changes since. > > There are multiple places that check SB_INLINECRYPT, and just one was > updated. Perhaps we should just require that if a filesystem sets > has_per_extent_encryption, then it also sets SB_INLINECRYPT > unconditionally?
has_per_extent_encryption means the kernel fs implementation supports extent encryption, not that the mounted filesystem uses encryption. That said it would result in all btrfs mounts setting SB_INLINECRYPT. Is that what you meant? --nX > - Eric
