> Do we need a Fixes tag here?
I overlooked the Fixes tag. Thanks for pointing that out. I will add:
Fixes: e13a6915a03f ("vhost/vsock: add IOTLB API support")
> Do we need to do the same in vhost-net too?
Yes, vhost-net has the same IOTLB lifecycle issue. I previously posted a
separate patch for vhost-net:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
I will update that patch in the next version to use the common IOTLB
teardown handling for the ACCESS_PLATFORM transition, while retaining
the vhost-net-specific checks for IN_ORDER and other unsafe feature
changes.
Thanks,
Jia
