On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 3:20 PM Maksim Davydov
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/17/26 17:08, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026, Maksim Davydov wrote:
> >> On 8/7/26 02:35, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> >>> index 29ca37e9a3bc..f55d0305d1f3 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> >>> @@ -342,8 +342,10 @@ void __init kvmclock_init(void)
> >>>     flags = pvclock_read_flags(&hv_clock_boot[0].pvti);
> >>>     kvm_sched_clock_init(flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT);
> >>>
> >>> -   x86_init.hyper.get_tsc_khz = kvmclock_get_tsc_khz;
> >>> -   x86_init.hyper.get_cpu_khz = kvmclock_get_tsc_khz;
> >>> +   if (!x86_init.hyper.get_tsc_khz)
> >>> +           x86_init.hyper.get_tsc_khz = kvmclock_get_tsc_khz;
> >>> +   if (!x86_init.hyper.get_cpu_khz)
> >>> +           x86_init.hyper.get_cpu_khz = kvmclock_get_tsc_khz;
> >>>     x86_platform.get_wallclock = kvm_get_wallclock;
> >>>     x86_platform.set_wallclock = kvm_set_wallclock;
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> >>
> >>
> >> I cannot test this right now as I lack two servers with different CPU
> >> base frequencies, but it seems that this patch might break something in
> >> guests:
> >> After migrating a VM (QEMU + KVM) from a host with one base frequency to
> >> another host with a different base frequency, the value in CPUID leaf
> >> 0x40000010 EAX changes and becomes the same as the destination host base
> >> frequency instead of remaining the source base frequency.
> >
> > That's a bug in whatever is orchestrating the migration, and/or QEMU if 
> > QEMU is
> > handing the upper layers a loaded footgun.
> >
> >> The main reason for this behaviour is that setting the TSC frequency via
> >> ioctl(KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ) doesn't change the value in CPUID leaf 0x40000010
> >> EAX and these two entities are still not connected.
> >
> > And they never will be.  It's userspace's responsibility to fill the correct
> > values for 0x40000010.
> >
> > But AFAICT, QEMU does the right thing.  env->tsc_khz is used for both the 
> > CPUID
> > leaf and for KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ.
> >
> > kvm_arch_init_vcpu():
> >
> >         c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> >         c->function = KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE | 0x10;
> >         c->eax = env->tsc_khz;
> >         c->ebx = env->apic_bus_freq / 1000; /* Hz to KHz */
> >         c->ecx = c->edx = 0;
> >
> > kvm_arch_set_tsc_khz():
> >
> >     r = set_ioctl ?
> >         kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ, env->tsc_khz) :
> >         -ENOTSUP;
> >
>
> Agreed.
> However, kvm_arch_set_tsc_khz() is also used at the end of migration
> (qemu_loadvm_state -> cpu_synchronize_post_init).
> So, the new value of env->tsc_khz from the source host can be loaded
> during migration via KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ. However, the frequency in CPUID
> leaf 0x40000010 remains the same as on the destination host (the TSC
> frequency can differ from the source host's frequency). Thus, it's
> possible to have unsynchronized CPUID leaf 0x40000010 when using default
> QEMU parameters.

I don't use qemu, but isn't the qemu solution for this general
situation to mark leaf 40000010H as 'unmigratable'?

Reply via email to