On 8/24/2026 5:47 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 01:51:17PM +0000, Naman Jain wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
index ea3377e61aa5c..0c362e86a09d9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
@@ -2468,7 +2468,6 @@ static struct irq_chip intcapxt_controller = {
.irq_unmask = intcapxt_unmask_irq,
.irq_mask = intcapxt_mask_irq,
.irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
- .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
.irq_set_affinity = intcapxt_set_affinity,
.irq_set_wake = intcapxt_set_wake,
.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND |
IRQCHIP_MOVE_DEFERRED,
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index 89816a2bd7cd3..cfc8fa403dad6 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -2119,7 +2119,6 @@ static bool hv_pcie_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
struct irq_domain *dom
info->ops->msi_prepare = hv_msi_prepare;
chip->irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent;
- chip->irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy;
Acked-by: Wei Liu <[email protected]>.
I suppose you do this because the first patch is supposed to be
backported.
Wei
Yes, exactly.
Regards,
Naman
