On 21/08/2026 5:21 pm, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 05:11:28PM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> On 21/08/2026 5:04 pm, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> This should probably just be a single patch with patch 1. > >> My idea here is that the first patch would get backported as that's >> true logs cleanup patch. (1024 lines of 1..1 are avoided with that). >> This patch wouldn't get backported. Its just formatting fixing of the >> output. > > I'm not sure there's any problem with the extra backports, and it's a > spec correctness fix for the output which given the existing scope of > stable backports is probably reasonable.
Okay. I'll merge this patch into the first patch; while keeping the first patch's fixes tag intact. -- Thanks, Usama
