>> Maybe we'd want a dedicated dump_page test tool in tools/mm that would make >> use >> of DUMP_USER_PAGES_TEST. But maybe we also want to remove >> DUMP_USER_PAGES_TEST >> entirely and have a different way to trigger+test this. >> >> Ideally we'd have a proper automated dump_page test that actually checks >> expected output (somehow). > > I think we can take this up separate from this series since it would > extend the scope of the series significantly. Does it work or do you > want me to incorporate it in the same series?
No, not at all :) -- Cheers, David
