On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 01:49:53PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2026-08-25 at 11:47 -0500, Frederick Lawler wrote: > > Hi Breno, > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 07:10:02AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 06:45:22PM -0500, Frederick Lawler wrote: > > > > IMA shouldn't measure or appraise configfs, but currently does because > > > > it's missing from the default exclusion policies. Move CONFIGFS_MAGIC to > > > > magic.h to expose the file system's magic to IMA, as well as other > > > > userland > > > > applications. > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <[email protected]> > > > > > > Do you want this change to go thorugh the configfs tree, or the tree > > > specific for IMA? > > > ? > > > > Unless you have a user asking for it, I personally think it makes sense > > for linux-integrity to take it since the two patches are related. > > > > I don't mind spinning a v3 for integrity if you choose to take it now. > > > > Best, > > Fred > > > > PS. Sorry for not keeping the Reviewed-by tag from v1. I usually > > forget _something_ with re-spins until after the fact. > > Breno, thank you for the Reviewed-by. The patch set didn't quite make it in > time for the open window, but I plan on upstreaming them. Can we change the > Reviewed-by to an Acked-by?
Sure. Feel free to do it. Acked-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
