The bcachefs ktest allocation-leak check writes rcutree.do_rcu_barrier
before reading /proc/allocinfo. While testing bcachefs performance
changes, small objects released with kfree_rcu() remained visible after
repeated writes to the hook and 20 seconds of waiting, causing otherwise
clean tests to fail their leak check.

The test assumes a stronger contract than the hook currently documents:
rcu_barrier() waits for ordinary callbacks, but does not flush objects
still held in kfree_rcu() batching or per-CPU SLUB sheaves. The retained
population eventually fell as a sheaf filled; there is no evidence here
of unbounded growth or OOM.

Changing the hook to drain kvfree_rcu() work let the same unmodified
bcachefs workload pass its allocation check. All eight checkpoints in
one VM, after 50 through 400 option changes, reported zero retained
reconcile_scan objects. This motivated the separate private-cache
reproducer used to isolate the incomplete drain from bcachefs.

Calling kvfree_rcu_barrier() from rcu_barrier_throttled() was proposed
when the former API was added in 2024, to restore a clean baseline
between userspace benchmark runs. The discussion concluded that keeping
the existing hook name, adding the second operation and documenting both
was the safest compatibility choice, but the follow-up was not added.

Add that drain and document the stronger test interface. Keep the
explicit rcu_barrier() so the hook's ordinary-callback contract does not
depend on kvfree_rcu_barrier() reaching an ordinary barrier internally.

Do not reuse the ordinary rcu_barrier() sequence as an early-completion
check while throttling: an unrelated ordinary barrier does not establish
that kvfree_rcu() work was drained. Retain the existing start-rate limit.

Four fresh VM pairs with the full private-cache fixture retained the
queued object without the patch (60 to 60 active objects) and drained it
with the patch (60 to 59). A separate ordinary-callback regression test
passed on both kernels.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Matthias Goergens <[email protected]>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  7 ++---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 27 ++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt 
b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 68647ff4bdd2..244a53166249 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5699,9 +5699,10 @@ Kernel parameters
                        there is an ongoing too-long CSD-lock wait.
 
        rcutree.do_rcu_barrier= [KNL]
-                       Request a call to rcu_barrier().  This is
-                       throttled so that userspace tests can safely
-                       hammer on the sysfs variable if they so choose.
+                       Request that deferred kfree_rcu() objects and
+                       ordinary call_rcu() callbacks be drained.  This is
+                       throttled so that userspace tests can safely hammer
+                       on the sysfs variable if they so choose.
                        If triggered before the RCU grace-period machinery
                        is fully active, this will error out with EAGAIN.
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 96848fc1f02b..014e28ec3bd3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3989,12 +3989,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
 static unsigned long rcu_barrier_last_throttle;
 
 /**
- * rcu_barrier_throttled - Do rcu_barrier(), but limit to one per second
+ * rcu_barrier_throttled - Drain deferred RCU frees, but rate-limit starts
  *
- * This can be thought of as guard rails around rcu_barrier() that
- * permits unrestricted userspace use, at least assuming the hardware's
- * try_cmpxchg() is robust.  There will be at most one call per second to
- * rcu_barrier() system-wide from use of this function, which means that
+ * This can be thought of as guard rails around the deferred-free barriers
+ * that permit unrestricted userspace use, at least assuming the hardware's
+ * try_cmpxchg() is robust.  There will be at most one drain operation started
+ * per sixteenth of a second from use of this function, which means that
  * callers might needlessly wait a second or three.
  *
  * This is intended for use by test suites to avoid OOM by flushing RCU
@@ -4011,18 +4011,25 @@ static void rcu_barrier_throttled(void)
 {
        unsigned long j = jiffies;
        unsigned long old = READ_ONCE(rcu_barrier_last_throttle);
-       unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
 
        while (time_in_range(j, old, old + HZ / 16) ||
               !try_cmpxchg(&rcu_barrier_last_throttle, &old, j)) {
                schedule_timeout_idle(HZ / 16);
-               if (rcu_seq_done(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence, s)) {
-                       smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above 
check. */
-                       return;
-               }
                j = jiffies;
                old = READ_ONCE(rcu_barrier_last_throttle);
        }
+       /*
+        * kfree_rcu() can retain objects outside the ordinary callback lists in
+        * per-CPU SLUB sheaves and kvfree_rcu batches.  Test suites use this 
hook
+        * to prevent deferred frees from spilling into the following test, so
+        * drain those queues as well as ordinary call_rcu() callbacks.
+        *
+        * kvfree_rcu_barrier() currently includes an ordinary barrier, but that
+        * is not part of its documented API.  Keep the explicit rcu_barrier() 
so
+        * this hook's original contract does not depend on slab implementation
+        * details.
+        */
+       kvfree_rcu_barrier();
        rcu_barrier();
 }
 
-- 
2.55.0


Reply via email to