On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:21:35 +0100 Yeoreum Yun <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are intermittent failures in collapse_max_ptes_swap() and > collapse_max_ptes_shared() when using the khugepaged_context: > > # Run test: collapse_max_ptes_shared (khugepaged:anon) > # Allocate huge page... OK > # Share huge page over fork()... OK > # Trigger CoW on page 1023 of 2048... OK > # Maybe collapse with max_ptes_shared exceeded.... OK > # Trigger CoW on page 1024 of 2048... Fail > Bail out! Unexpected huge page > # Planned tests != run tests (26 != 23) > # Totals: pass:23 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > # Run test: collapse_max_ptes_swap (khugepaged:anon) > # Swapout 257 of 2048 pages... OK > # Maybe collapse with max_ptes_swap exceeded.... OK > # Swapout 256 of 2048 pages... OK > Bail out! Unexpected huge page > # Planned tests != run tests (26 != 17) > # Totals: pass:17 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > This happens because khugepaged may collapse the pages before wait_for_scan() > is called, causing a sanity check that expects uncollapsed pages to fail. Is this something we should be testing for? If I'm understanding correctly, success/failure is dependent on timing vargaries inside the kernel and that isn't something we can reliably test for. IOW, should we say "bad idea" and just delete this test case?

