On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 05:00:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> 
> Implement a two-phase wildcard scan to guarantee forward progress of
> synchronize_hazptr() even if there is a steady stream of ill-timed
> readers which populate wildcards into per-CPU slots.
> 
> This is performed by flipping between two wildcard values (1UL and 2UL),
> and alternatively scanning for the opposite wildcard while newcoming
> readers use the other one.
> 
> There is no possibility to miss a reader because all slots for all
> wildcards are accounted for during a synchronize.
> 
> As a simplification, use this period flip to drive the hazptr overflow
> list selection as well, since there is really no point is making the
> overflow list flip use a different state.
> 
> Protect the wildcard flip with a mutex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/hazptr.h |  6 ++-
>  kernel/hazptr.c        | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/hazptr.h b/include/linux/hazptr.h
> index 43998bf43de4..43122c5673bd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hazptr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hazptr.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
>  
>  /* 4 slots (each sizeof(hazptr_slot_item)) fit in a single 64-byte cache 
> line. */
>  #define NR_HAZPTR_PERCPU_SLOTS       4
> -#define HAZPTR_WILDCARD              ((void *) 0x1UL)
> +
> +/* The current hazard pointer wildcard. */
> +extern void *hazptr_wildcard;
>  
>  /*
>   * Hazard pointer slot.
> @@ -243,7 +245,7 @@ void *hazptr_acquire(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx, void * const 
> *addr_p)
>  #endif
>       if (unlikely(slot->addr))
>               return __hazptr_acquire(ctx, addr_p);
> -     WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, HAZPTR_WILDCARD);        /* Store B */
> +     WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard));     /* Store B */
>  
>       /* Memory ordering: Store B before Load A. */
>       smp_mb();
> diff --git a/kernel/hazptr.c b/kernel/hazptr.c
> index a9d3d68a1525..d3d1050d92cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/hazptr.c
> +++ b/kernel/hazptr.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,17 @@
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  
> +/*
> + * The current hazard pointer wildcard. Flips between 1UL and 2UL to 
> guarantee
> + * hazptr_synchronize forward progress even with a steady stream of readers.
> + * This wildcard value is used by acquire to temporarily tag the per-CPU 
> slots.
> + * This also affects the overflow list selection: the current list used by
> + * readers is array[(unsigned long) hazptr_wildcard - 1].
> + */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_wildcard_lock);   /* Protect the wildcard flip. */
> +void *hazptr_wildcard = (void *) 1UL;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_wildcard);
> +
>  struct hazptr_overflow_list {
>       raw_spinlock_t lock;            /* Lock protecting overflow list and 
> list generation. */
>       struct hlist_head head;         /* Overflow list head. */
> @@ -28,8 +39,6 @@ struct hazptr_overflow_list {
>   * limited to the number of list elements.
>   */
>  struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip {
> -     struct mutex lock;              /* Mutex protecting add_idx from 
> concurrent updates. */
> -     unsigned int add_idx;           /* Index of current flip-list to add 
> to. */
>       struct hazptr_overflow_list array[2];
>  };
>  
> @@ -38,6 +47,20 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip, 
> percpu_overflow_list_fli
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hazptr_percpu_slots, hazptr_percpu_slots);
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_percpu_slots);
>  
> +static
> +void *flip_wildcard(void *wildcard)
> +{
> +     return ((unsigned long) wildcard == 1UL) ? (void *) 2UL : (void *) 1UL;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +bool is_wildcard(void *addr)
> +{
> +     if ((unsigned long) addr == 1UL || (unsigned long) addr == 2UL)
> +             return true;
> +     return false;
> +}
> +
>  static
>  struct hazptr_slot *hazptr_get_free_percpu_slot(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx)
>  {
> @@ -72,7 +95,7 @@ void *__hazptr_acquire(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx, void * const 
> *addr_p)
>        */
>       if (unlikely(!slot))
>               slot = hazptr_chain_backup_slot(ctx);
> -     WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, HAZPTR_WILDCARD);        /* Store B */
> +     WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard));     /* Store B */
>  
>       /* Memory ordering: Store B before Load A. */
>       smp_mb();
> @@ -118,7 +141,9 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(struct 
> hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list
>               for (;;) {
>                       void *load_addr = 
> smp_load_acquire(&backup_slot->slot.addr);    /* Load B */
>  
> -                     if (load_addr != addr && load_addr != HAZPTR_WILDCARD)
> +                     /* We don't expect wildcards in overflow list. */
> +                     WARN_ON_ONCE(is_wildcard(load_addr));
> +                     if (load_addr != addr)
>                               break;
>                       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&overflow_list->lock, flags);
>                       cpu_relax();
> @@ -139,7 +164,7 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(struct 
> hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list
>  }
>  
>  static
> -void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr)
> +void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
>  {
>       struct hazptr_percpu_slots *percpu_slots = 
> per_cpu_ptr(&hazptr_percpu_slots, cpu);
>       unsigned int idx;
> @@ -148,7 +173,39 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr)
>               struct hazptr_slot_item *item = &percpu_slots->items[idx];
>  
>               /* Busy-wait if node is found. */
> -             smp_cond_load_acquire(&item->slot.addr, VAL != addr && VAL != 
> HAZPTR_WILDCARD); /* Load B */
> +             smp_cond_load_acquire(&item->slot.addr, VAL != addr && VAL != 
> scan_wildcard); /* Load B */
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> +{
> +     unsigned int scan_idx = (unsigned long) scan_wildcard - 1;
> +     int cpu;
> +
> +     /* Scan all CPUs slots. */
> +     for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +             struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = 
> per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
> +
> +             /*
> +              * Scan CPU slots.
> +              * Forward progress against recurring wildcards is guaranteed
> +              * by scanning for one wildcard while new elements use the
> +              * other wildcard value (1UL vs 2UL).
> +              * Forward progress against recurring single hazard pointer
> +              * values is guaranteed by the fact that a hazard pointer
> +              * is not reclaimed nor reused until the scan for that hazard
> +              * pointer completes, which prevents a steady flow of readers
> +              * to acquire that same hazard pointer value.
> +              */
> +             hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(cpu, addr, scan_wildcard);
> +
> +             /*
> +              * Scan backup slots in percpu overflow lists.
> +              * Forward progress is guaranteed by scanning one list
> +              * while new elements are added into the other list.
> +              */
> +             
> hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(&overflow_list_flip->array[scan_idx], addr);
>       }
>  }
>  
> @@ -161,7 +218,7 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr)
>   */
>  void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
>  {
> -     int cpu;
> +     void *scan_wildcard;
>  
>       /*
>        * Busy-wait should only be done from preemptible context.
> @@ -177,33 +234,19 @@ void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
>               return;
>       /* Memory ordering: Store A before Load B. */
>       smp_mb();
> -     /* Scan all CPUs slots. */
> -     for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -             struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = 
> per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
> -             unsigned int scan_idx;
> -
> -             /* Scan CPU slots. */
> -             hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(cpu, addr);
>  
> -             /*
> -              * Scan backup slots in percpu overflow lists.
> -              * Forward progress is guaranteed by scanning one list
> -              * while new elements are added into the other list.
> -              */
> -             guard(mutex)(&overflow_list_flip->lock);
> -             scan_idx = overflow_list_flip->add_idx ^ 1;
> -             
> hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(&overflow_list_flip->array[scan_idx], addr);
> -             /* Flip current list. */
> -             WRITE_ONCE(overflow_list_flip->add_idx, scan_idx);
> -             
> hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(&overflow_list_flip->array[scan_idx ^ 1], 
> addr);
> -     }
> +     guard(mutex)(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
> +     scan_wildcard = flip_wildcard(hazptr_wildcard);
> +     hazptr_scan_period(addr, scan_wildcard);
> +     WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, scan_wildcard);     /* Flip the current 
> wildcard. */
> +     hazptr_scan_period(addr, flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_synchronize);
>  
>  struct hazptr_slot *hazptr_chain_backup_slot(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx)
>  {
>       struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = 
> this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip);
> -     unsigned int list_idx = READ_ONCE(overflow_list_flip->add_idx);
> +     unsigned int list_idx = (unsigned long) READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard) - 1;


What if this happens?

        { <hazptr_wildcard == 2UL> }

        CPU 0                           CPU 1
        =====                           =====
        hazptr_acquire(ctx, &gp):
          WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard));   /* Store B */
          // slot->addr == 2
          smp_mb();

          addr = READ_ONCE(*addr_p);      /* Load A */
          // ^ addr == gp == old, i.e not NULL

                                        /* unpublish and wait for reader */
                                        old = gp;
                                        WRITE_ONCE(gp, NULL);
                                        hazptr_synchronize(old):
                                          smp_mb();
                                          guard(mutex)(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
                                          scan_wildcard = 
flip_wildcard(hazptr_wildcard);
                                          // ^ scan_wildcard == 1;

                                          hazptr_scan_period(addr, 
scan_wildcard);
                                          // ^ will miss reader on CPU 0
                                          // because its slot->addr == 2
                                          WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, 
scan_wildcard);   /* Flip the current wildcard. */

        { <hazptr_wildcard == 1UL> }

          WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, addr);

        hazptr_detach():
          hazptr_chain_backup_slot():
            list_idx = READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard) - 1;
            // ^ list_idx == 0

          smp_store_release(&slot->addr, NULL);
          // ^ clear the per-CPU slot
                                          // flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard) == 2
                                          hazptr_scan_period(addr, 
flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
                                          // ^ will miss reader on CPU 0
                                          // because it only scans list
                                          // 1.

If I'm not missing anything, then it means a reader can dodge the
hazptr_synchronize() scan, because its per-CPU slot can appear on
wildchard=1 but its backup slot can be on wildcard=2.

Thoughts?

Regards,
Boqun

>       struct hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list = 
> &overflow_list_flip->array[list_idx];
>       struct hazptr_slot *slot = &ctx->backup_slot.slot;
>  
> @@ -233,7 +276,6 @@ void __init hazptr_init(void)
>       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>               struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = 
> per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
>  
> -             mutex_init(&overflow_list_flip->lock);
>               for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>                       raw_spin_lock_init(&overflow_list_flip->array[i].lock);
>                       INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&overflow_list_flip->array[i].head);
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

Reply via email to