Hi

This patch conflicts with the patch 
c2e894eac398b258f12fdec73ed6ba081047f7b3 (which also fixes the 
use-after-free condition).

Please, download the current kernel 7.3-rc4 and test if the bug is still 
present there. If it is, send a patch against 7.3-rc4.

Mikulas


On Thu, 17 Sep 2026, Wentao Liang wrote:

> When the generation of the segment referenced by a replayed key is
> stale, kset_replay() releases the key with cache_key_put().  The caller
> holds the only reference, so the key is freed, yet the function then
> dereferences key->cache_pos to pin the segment.
> 
> Pin the segment before the key can be released.
> 
> Fixes: 1d57628ff95b ("dm-pcache: add persistent cache target in 
> device-mapper")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_key.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_key.c 
> b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_key.c
> index e068e878231b..668c16a2e111 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_key.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_key.c
> @@ -730,6 +730,12 @@ static int kset_replay(struct pcache_cache *cache, 
> struct pcache_cache_kset_onme
>  
>               __set_bit(key->cache_pos.cache_seg->cache_seg_id, 
> cache->seg_map);
>  
> +             /*
> +              * Pin the segment while the key is still alive: the stale key
> +              * below is released and freed by cache_key_put().
> +              */
> +             cache_seg_get(key->cache_pos.cache_seg);
> +
>               /* Check if the segment generation is valid for insertion. */
>               if (key->seg_gen < key->cache_pos.cache_seg->gen) {
>                       cache_key_put(key);
> @@ -739,8 +745,6 @@ static int kset_replay(struct pcache_cache *cache, struct 
> pcache_cache_kset_onme
>                       cache_key_insert(&cache->req_key_tree, key, true);
>                       spin_unlock(&cache_subtree->tree_lock);
>               }
> -
> -             cache_seg_get(key->cache_pos.cache_seg);
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


Reply via email to