On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:07:45 +0100 Rodrigo Alencar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22/09/26 16:56, Rodrigo Alencar wrote: > > esOn 29/07/26 09:25, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote: > > > From: Rodrigo Alencar <[email protected]> > > > > > > Add IIO_FREQUENCY channel type to support Direct Digital Synthesizer (DDS) > > > devices that handles frequency values written directly to its buffered > > > interface. > > > > ... > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Alencar <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 1 + > > > include/uapi/linux/iio/types.h | 1 + > > > tools/iio/iio_event_monitor.c | 2 ++ > > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > > > b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > > > index bdf3d4c06331..a45277bc5d99 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static const char * const iio_chan_type_name_spec[] = { > > > [IIO_ATTENTION] = "attention", > > > [IIO_ALTCURRENT] = "altcurrent", > > > [IIO_COVERAGE] = "coverage", > > > + [IIO_FREQUENCY] = "frequency", > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > Thanks for not giving up on this one! Taking a look at the testing branch, > > I think this line was dropped during the rebase (addressing a conflict) Fixed up. Build test just running. Thanks! > > btw, now that we are at this again, it crossed my mind... > Is it fine to have a channel named the same way an attribute may be named? > wonder if userspace tools could get confused. I don't think so as they should be dealing with the ordering of different things and we will always have a channel type before a modifier. Jonathan >
