On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:13:10 +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> qcom,hawi-cdsp-pas was initially grouped as a fallback to
> qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas on the assumption of hardware-level compatibility.
> Bringup revealed that the NSP proxy power domain on Hawi requires a
> specific RPMH performance level that the sm8550 driver data does not
> provide, breaking the compatibility contract the fallback string implies.
> Maili CDSP shares the same NSP power domain topology as Hawi and must
> fall back to qcom,hawi-cdsp-pas rather than qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas to
> inherit the correct cx/mxc/nsp power-domain constraint.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: make qcom,hawi-cdsp-pas
standalone
commit: bdcb3b5116c36667f52dd80dd24b117cb8101ff5
[2/2] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: add per-PD proxy performance states for Hawi
CDSP
commit: 2eb7702db31d4b468bbb9380dddf1dd3443cac6b
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
