On 9/24/26 15:15, [email protected] wrote: > [Severity: Medium] > Is the invariant behind this assertion always true? The commit message > says "On a failed connect(), transport is de-assigned", but > vsock_unconnected_reset() can return early without de-assigning:
Addressed in comments to patch #3. > [Severity: Low] > Could the new precondition be documented? Yes. > [Severity: Low] > With this block gone, two comments elsewhere in the file still explain a > load-bearing check in terms of reassignment. Should they be updated? Yes.
