Hi Tanmay,

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
> driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
> corresponding cleanup.
> 

Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls
virtio_reset_device()?

> Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, 
> void *data)
>  {
>       struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
>  
> +     virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> +
>       unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
>       return 0;
>  }
> 
> base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to