On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 09:06:35AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sept 2026 at 22:43, Yonghao Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 11:34:14AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > > Good day,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 10:58:55AM +0800, Yonghao Zhang wrote:
> > > > Auto-boot for an always-on remote processor registers an asynchronous
> > > > request_firmware_nowait() whose callback discards the fetched image
> > >
> > > The callback function is rproc_auto_boot_callback() but I don't see where 
> > > the
> > > image fetched by request_firmware_nowait() is discarded.
> >
> > It is the release_firmware(fw) called at the end of this callback.
> 
> Right, this is happening at the _end_ of the callback, but the
> changelog says the firmware is discarded and then rproc_boot() called.
> This is not accurate and needs to be fixed.
>

The [PATCH v2] I sent earlier today carries a wrong In-Reply-To and
won't show up in this thread on lore.  It is available here:

        
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/[email protected]/T/#u

Thanks,
Yonghao

> > The image fetched by request_firmware_nowait() is never consumed:
> > rproc_boot() doesn't take it as an argument and fetches it's own copy
> > with a synchronous request_firmware(). It is that second copy which
> > rproc_fw_boot() parses and which is release at the end of rproc_boot().
> > The asynchronous copy is only ever touched by the final
> > release_firmware(fw) -- fetched, never read, freed.
> >
> > "Discarded" in the commit message refers to exactly that. I can send
> > a v2 that names this release_firmware() explicitly in the first
> > paragraph if you want the message to be verifiable at a glance.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yonghao
> >
> > >
> > > Otherwise I agree with this patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mathieu
> > >
> > > > and calls rproc_boot().  rproc_boot() then fetches the very same image
> > > > again with a synchronous request_firmware(), so every auto-boot reads
> > > > the firmware image twice and allocates the buffer twice; on kernels
> > > > with the sysfs fallback enabled, the uevent round-trip is repeated
> > > > as well.
> > > >
> > > > The asynchronous request exists only so that rproc_add() does not
> > > > block on the filesystem read; the image it fetches is never used.
> > > > The core already defers rproc_boot() to a worker for detached
> > > > processors (attach_work).  Reuse that worker for offline processors
> > > > too and drop the asynchronous firmware request: rproc_boot() fetches
> > > > the image exactly once and dispatches between a firmware boot and
> > > > an attach based on the proccessor state.  The work is renamed to
> > > > boot_work to match its widened role.
> > > >
> > > > commit 400e64df6b23 ("remoteproc: add framework for controlling remote
> > > > processors") noted back in 2011 that "we must wait until it completes
> > > > before we try to unregister the device".  rproc_del() now does exactly
> > > > that: it waits for the boot work with cancel_work_sync(), which also
> > > > closes the theoretical window in which a pending attach work could
> > > > outlive the rproc instance.
> > > >
> > > > The changed fallback behaviour only matters for legacy
> > > > configurations.  udev dropped its userspace firmware loader back in
> > > > 2014, as recorded in
> > > > Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fallback-mechanisms.rst, and the
> > > > kernel has documented since commit 02c399306826 ("firmware_loader:
> > > > enhance Kconfig documentation over FW_LOADER") that "Linux no longer
> > > > relies on or uses a fallback mechanism in userspace".  Auto-boot now
> > > > uses the same synchronous fallback semantics as every other explicit
> > > > boot source (sysfs, cdev).
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yonghao Zhang <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 65 ++++++++--------------------
> > > >  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 +-
> > > >  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
> > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > > index 263e12f022ea..f329dc478170 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > > @@ -1662,49 +1662,26 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  /*
> > > > - * take a firmware and boot it up.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Note: this function is called asynchronously upon registration of 
> > > > the
> > > > - * remote processor (so we must wait until it completes before we try
> > > > - * to unregister the device. one other option is just to use kref here,
> > > > - * that might be cleaner).
> > > > + * Boot or attach the remote processor in the background, on behalf of
> > > > + * rproc_trigger_auto_boot(): rproc_add() runs in probe context and 
> > > > must
> > > > + * not block while the firmware image is read from storage.  
> > > > rproc_boot()
> > > > + * dispatches on the processor state, so this covers both a firmware 
> > > > boot
> > > > + * and an attach to a processor started by another entity.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Note: rproc_del() waits for this work to complete with
> > > > + * cancel_work_sync(), so the rproc instance remains valid for the
> > > > + * entire lifetime of this function.
> > > >   */
> > > > -static void rproc_auto_boot_callback(const struct firmware *fw, void 
> > > > *context)
> > > > +static void rproc_boot_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > >  {
> > > > -   struct rproc *rproc = context;
> > > > +   struct rproc *rproc = container_of(work, struct rproc, boot_work);
> > > >
> > > >     rproc_boot(rproc);
> > > > -
> > > > -   release_firmware(fw);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static void rproc_attach_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > +static void rproc_trigger_auto_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > >  {
> > > > -   struct rproc *rproc = container_of(work, struct rproc, attach_work);
> > > > -
> > > > -   rproc_boot(rproc);
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static int rproc_trigger_auto_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > > -{
> > > > -   int ret;
> > > > -
> > > > -   if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) {
> > > > -           schedule_work(&rproc->attach_work);
> > > > -           return 0;
> > > > -   }
> > > > -
> > > > -   /*
> > > > -    * We're initiating an asynchronous firmware loading, so we can
> > > > -    * be built-in kernel code, without hanging the boot process.
> > > > -    */
> > > > -   ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, FW_ACTION_UEVENT,
> > > > -                                 rproc->firmware, &rproc->dev, 
> > > > GFP_KERNEL,
> > > > -                                 rproc, rproc_auto_boot_callback);
> > > > -   if (ret < 0)
> > > > -           dev_err(&rproc->dev, "request_firmware_nowait err: %d\n", 
> > > > ret);
> > > > -
> > > > -   return ret;
> > > > +   schedule_work(&rproc->boot_work);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
> > > > @@ -2348,11 +2325,8 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > >     rproc_create_debug_dir(rproc);
> > > >
> > > >     /* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
> > > > -   if (rproc->auto_boot) {
> > > > -           ret = rproc_trigger_auto_boot(rproc);
> > > > -           if (ret < 0)
> > > > -                   goto rproc_remove_dev;
> > > > -   }
> > > > +   if (rproc->auto_boot)
> > > > +           rproc_trigger_auto_boot(rproc);
> > > >
> > > >     /* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */
> > > >     mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> > > > @@ -2361,10 +2335,6 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > >
> > > >     return 0;
> > > >
> > > > -rproc_remove_dev:
> > > > -   cancel_work_sync(&rproc->crash_handler);
> > > > -   rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> > > > -   device_del(dev);
> > > >  rproc_remove_cdev:
> > > >     rproc_char_device_remove(rproc);
> > > >     return ret;
> > > > @@ -2552,7 +2522,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, 
> > > > const char *name,
> > > >     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rproc->subdevs);
> > > >     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rproc->dump_segments);
> > > >
> > > > -   INIT_WORK(&rproc->attach_work, rproc_attach_work);
> > > > +   INIT_WORK(&rproc->boot_work, rproc_boot_work);
> > > >     INIT_WORK(&rproc->crash_handler, rproc_crash_handler_work);
> > > >     spin_lock_init(&rproc->crash_handler_lock);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -2630,6 +2600,9 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > >     if (cancel_work_sync(&rproc->crash_handler))
> > > >             pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
> > > >
> > > > +   /* auto-boot may still be fetching firmware: wait for it here */
> > > > +   cancel_work_sync(&rproc->boot_work);
> > > > +
> > > >     __rproc_shutdown(rproc, true);
> > > >
> > > >     rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > > index a44368737b39..d77e24539133 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ enum rproc_features {
> > > >   * @subdevs: list of subdevices, to following the running state
> > > >   * @notifyids: idr for dynamically assigning rproc-wide unique notify 
> > > > ids
> > > >   * @index: index of this rproc device
> > > > - * @attach_work: workqueue for attaching rproc
> > > > + * @boot_work: workqueue for booting rproc
> > > >   * @crash_handler: workqueue for handling a crash
> > > >   * @crash_handler_lock: serializes crash handler queueing and deletion
> > > >   * @deleting: remoteproc deletion has begun
> > > > @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ struct rproc {
> > > >     struct list_head subdevs;
> > > >     struct idr notifyids;
> > > >     int index;
> > > > -   struct work_struct attach_work;
> > > > +   struct work_struct boot_work;
> > > >     struct work_struct crash_handler;
> > > >     spinlock_t crash_handler_lock;
> > > >     bool deleting;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >

Reply via email to