Hi, Jerome > On lun. 28 sept. 2026 at 11:10, Changhuang Liang > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, Jerome > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > >> On dim. 20 sept. 2026 at 05:00, Changhuang Liang > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > From: Sia Jee Heng <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > StarFive JHB100 shares a similar clock and reset design with JH7110. > >> > To facilitate the reuse of the file and its functionalities, files > >> > containing the "jh71x0" naming convention are renamed to use the > >> > "common" wording. > >> > >> Is this really necessary ? Rename are generally not recommended. > >> Do we really care if your new soc use something named after the older > one ? > >> > >> You are naming it common now but how long is it going to stay "common" ? > >> If your next SoC does not use this anymore it won't be common for long ... > >> > > > > Okay, I will drop the current PATCH 1/2/3/4 and directly reuse the current > JH71x0-related interfaces. > > > > Please make sure your series applies on clk-next next time around. > This one failed to apply when it was sent.
Okay, I will send the next version based on clk-next. Best Regards,
