On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 09:20:01 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> wrote:
... > > Even if there's just a three line comment above a fn, history proves > that it will not reliably stay in sync as the fn changes. An automation > step/check is needed. The only way it can possibly stay in step is to have the compiler process the same source text. Then, if you add/change a function parameter you'd be pretty much forced to add/change the comment. Return values would have to be documented at the C return statement and really as an extra parameter to the return. But, IMHO, the whole thing adds too much bloat to the source files. When you 'grep' a source file, you don't really want another match in a big comment at the top of every function. David > > > ~Gregory
