On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 07:36:17PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > Hm... What do you think Konstantin? > > > > > > I remember the workflows@ list was originally created to share our > > > secret/magical workflows, and I'm not sure that this one qualifies. We can > > > start a new list too if it's easier. > > > > Eh. At this point I'm trying to shove everyone towards "just use dfn: > > queries > > for your stuff, stop relying on actual 'lists'". I'd just leave it as > > linux-kernel@vger, honestly, since the automated patch churn may annoy those > > people on the workflows list that we actually want to keep there. > > Konstantin, > > The "Documentation Process" entry already points to the workflow@ mailing > list. > Changes proposed in "AGENT RESOURCES" will affect everyone, so sending such > important patches to LKML (/dev/null) does not seem right to me.
Ah, sorry, I hadn't actually realized that it already has F: entries in MAINTAINERS. Then my observation is really moot and if you think workflows makes more sense, especially with linux-kernel being a firehose where everyone is just going to miss any patches, then let's use workflows@. -K
