On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 04:47:14PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Sasha Levin <[email protected]> writes: > > > At the Maintainers Summit, Ted asked whether the stable trees have a way > > to deal with incorrect Fixes tags. Hannes estimated that 15-20% of them > > are wrong, often because the author ran git blame and took the first > > commit that touched the line [1]. We use LLM workflows to find the > > commit that actually introduced a bug, and others asked us to share > > them. > > > > This series adds them as agent skills under agents/skills/, together > > with a skill for writing commit messages: > > Time to argue for a more fuchsia shade of mauve without actually getting > into the substance of what you're doing...:) > > I wonder about the top-level agents/ directory. If we regard this > material as documentation, perhaps the "skills" should go there too? As > readable text, they might just help to improve human skills as well, > assuming we think we still need those. Under Documentation, they could > be built into the rendered docs and made more widely available. > > Otherwise, if this is primarily a development tool, perhaps under tools/ > makes sense? > > I lack strong opinions here, but figured I would ask the question.
I was expecting this to appear under Documentation/. The agents are designed to read human text, so let's make it at least passingly sensible for humans to read too. :) -- Kees Cook
