On 10/10/2026 8:50 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 10/10/26 10:37, Huang, Honglei wrote:
On 10/10/2026 2:53 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
24.09.2026 12:55, Honglei Huang пишет:
+int virtio_gpu_userptr_create(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
+ struct drm_file *file,
+ struct virtio_gpu_object_params *params,
+ struct virtio_gpu_object **bo_ptr)
+{
+ struct virtio_gpu_object_userptr *userptr;
+ struct virtio_gpu_mem_entry *ents = NULL;
+ struct sg_table *sgt;
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
+ unsigned long lock_limit;
+ unsigned long start;
+ unsigned long end;
+ s64 new_pinned;
+ unsigned int nents;
+ int ret;
+
+ *bo_ptr = NULL;
+
+ if (!params->size || !IS_ALIGNED(params->size, PAGE_SIZE) ||
+ params->userptr != (unsigned long)params->userptr)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ start = params->userptr;
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE) ||
+ check_add_overflow(start, (unsigned long)params->size, &end))
+ return -EINVAL;
There is new vgdev->blob_alignment defining host page size as it may
differ from guest's page. Will be good to validate both.
Will add blob_alignment check in next version, thanks for the review.
Missed that verify_blob() already should be validating the userptr
blob_alignment. The patches look good.
BTW, previously the extra AMD KFD patches were needed on host kernel,
did they land upstream?
According to KFD maintainer, they want to us to add those virtio
specific feature into drm svm, a new SVM frame work based on drm svm
helpers. We are working on it:
https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/[email protected]/
And the amdgpu VM maintainer has agreed that he will help to consider
how to intergate the virtio requirements into the design of amdgpu drmsvm.
And for now we can use a user space method to replace the AMD KFD
patches function, it is mremap, it also works, we tested it, but
it has some performance loss, I will update the whole thing when all the
components code are ready.
Regards,
Honglei
