On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 02:55:59PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > The absence of the tag on a suspicious series offered a low-effort way > > for maintainers to push back. What's the proposed low-effort replacement > > ? > > Greg's suggested asking "how did you test this?" or similar, a lot of > people just throwing stuff at the wall simply won't respond.
I've done that too. I still find it better to have multiple tools at my disposal, I want to be able to tell people they're expected to disclose that the code they submit was generated. Maybe Documentation/process/generated-content.rst is enough. As I wrote, what matters to me is the disclosure requirement, not the Assisted-by tag as such. I'm however concerned that it's even easier for contributors to ignore Documentation/process/generated-content.rst than the tag. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
