On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 04:10:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 02:21:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > I've queued this series up for some testing, in a separate branch. JFYI. > > More testing it obviously good. I've been waiting for addressing > of the Sashiko comments on the nvme patches before doing more ACKs, > and while I can't really judge the code those in the dma-buf code > also look somewhat serious. So it would be useful to get them addressed > and the series reposted. Same for folding in the PI vs dmabuf fix > from Anuj, although making the combination work would of course be > even better. >
Oops, I forgot to look at Sashiko's feedback when I acked the dma-buf patch. I think the two cleanup issues are valid, but the reclaim-related ones are not. I'm not sure why Sashiko is confused here. I wonder if there are some shrinkers in the tree that incorrectly take dma-resv locks in a blocking manner. They should only use trylocks in shrinkers and direct reclaim paths. Matt
