I didn't want to conflate fscrypt patches with Ceph features; arguably two distinct patchsets.
I will CC you folks when this is acked then. On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 10:38 PM Eric Biggers <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 09:52:11PM +0300, Alex Markuze wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > This supports the concurrent CephFS subvolume quarantine series. > > There’s no Fixes: tag since this isn't addressing an existing upstream > > regression. > > > > The quarantine series adds checks to Ceph's ->get_link(). However, if > > an encrypted symlink target was cached prior to quarantine, the VFS > > bypasses that callback entirely when following or reading it. While > > the target data is still valid, access now needs to be denied. > > > > This patch adds an opt-out for symlink caching and enables it for > > Ceph, handling the encrypted-symlink case for the concurrent series > > without affecting other filesystems. > > > > That series wasn't sent to me. Is it > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ ? > It would make more sense to add this patch to that series so that they > can be reviewed together. I can potentially apply a prerequisite patch > by itself, but we'd first need to know that the rest has been reviewed > and will be accepted too, otherwise it will be unused code. > > - Eric >
