On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:38:16PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:38:59PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>>>>> If we can have a private member in kobj_attribute, we can found the
>>> content
>>>>> to be returned in a single step.
>>>> Ok, again, just send me a patch that adds this functionality and we will
>>>> be very glad to consider it.
>>> [1/2] Add a private data field within kobj_attribute structure.
>>>
>>> This patch add a private data field, declared as void *, within
>>> kobj_attribute
>>> structure. Anyone wants to use sysfs can store their private data to
>>> refer at
>>> _show() and _store() method.
>>> It enables to share a single method function with several similar
>>> entries,
>>> like ones to export the list of capabilities the running kernel
>>> supported.
>> But your patch 2/2 doesn't use this interface, why not?
>
> Really?
> The following two _show() methods shared by every capabilities refer
> the private member of kobj_attribute.
>
> | +static ssize_t capability_name_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> | + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> | + char *buffer)
> | +{
> | + /* It returns numerical representation of capability. */
> | + return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", (int) attr->data);
> | +}
> | +
> | +static ssize_t capability_code_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> | + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> | + char *buffer)
> | +{
> | + /* It returns symbolic representation of capability. */
> | + return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", (char *) attr->data);
> | +}
Ah, sorry, missed that. I also missed where this was set up as well :(
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
