* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:37:52 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Note: Andrew might get grumpy when > > your PCI tree starts changing nearby places in arch/x86/pci again and it > > clashes with these changes in x86.git > > s/Andrew/Stephen/I hope/;)/ > > Hopefully we can soon start feeding these more problematic trees into > linux-next and yes, Stephen will need some more thought/support from > his upstreams to make that viable.
btw., the correct metric would be "real user-side regressions per commit" (maybe real regressions per line of code changed), not "number of commits". With the latter metric, x86.git is "problematic". For the former, it's much less so ;-) i.e. you should punish buggy trees that affect real testers out there, not high-flux trees that by virtue of their flux cause more integration work. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/