Hi Adrian,
On 2/20/2008, "Adrian Bunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Coverity checker spotted the following inconsequent NULL checking
> introduced by commit 8ff12cfc009a2a38d87fa7058226fe197bb2696f:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> static inline int is_end(void *addr)
> {
> return (unsigned long)addr & PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
> }
> ...
> static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
> {
> ...
> if (c->freelist) <----------------------------------------
> stat(c, DEACTIVATE_REMOTE_FREES);
I spotted this too. c->freelist should never be NULL so why not send a
patch to Christoph?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
