On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:23:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases > > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next > > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree its not obvious how > > I would communicate which tree I had tested. I guess we could use the > > SHA1 of the actual head used, but that really is cumbersome for the poor > > people who have to check the results and actually report things to lkml. > > I hope I have addressed this issue by tagging each tree with its date > i.e. todays was next-20080220. > > > Also will you be producing any tarballs for these releases? If so I > > would say they would definatly need to be against some common base, like > > against the nearest official tag "below". > > I hadn't considered tarballs, but I will give it some thought.
I'd like to see tarballs too, please... --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/