On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:45:13 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But for computers, limits is an expected and understood term, and for > > filesystems it's quotas. So in this case, I *still* think you should > > be using the term "Memory Quota Controller" instead. It just makes it > > clearer to a larger audience what you mean. > > > > Memory Quota sounds very confusing to me. Usually a quota implies limits, but > in > a true framework, one can also implement guarantees and shares. > This "cgroup memory contoller" is called as "Memory Resource Contoller" in my office ;) How about Memory Resouce Contoller ? -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
