On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:42:16PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

 > >  > I thought that thread was for the much larger patches, not just this
 > >  > Makefile change.
 > > 
 > > At the least we'll likely want to also pick up the other stack protector 
 > > fixes
 > > that went into .25rc if we turn it on in .24
 > 
 > Hm, that sounds like a new feature :)
 > 
 > I thought the makefile change was just a bugfix in the broken makefile.

Well, it is. But it'll cause it to enable something that has been broken for a 
while.
FWIW, I think having the stack protector reenabled in -stable is a worthwhile 
goal,
but only once it's stabilised for a while in the development tree.

My fear by just reenabling this for -stable is that when distros push out 
updates
based on the latest -stable, we'll see more systems like James' problematic 
system.

        Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to