On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:05:25 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:11:01 +0000 Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Just wrap this one in a lock_kernel. As I understand it there is no M68K > > SMP anyway. > > > > I assume that all the bkl/locking patches are prerequisites for > tty-bkl-pushdown.patch, and that they don't depend upon > tty-bkl-pushdown.patch? They are all prequisites for some changes I've yet to send you and will do once I'm sure I've not upset anything in the meantime. There should be no interdependancies although I've obviously not tested every possible combination Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
