File is now error free.
Compile tested.
Patch is against x86#testing

Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
index 7f9c6da..7dc5d5c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
@@ -27,17 +27,17 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context 
*ctxt)
        /*
         * descriptor tables
         */
-       store_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
-       store_idt(&ctxt->idt);
-       store_tr(ctxt->tr);
+       store_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
+       store_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+       store_tr(ctxt->tr);
 
        /*
         * segment registers
         */
-       savesegment(es, ctxt->es);
-       savesegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
-       savesegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
-       savesegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
+       savesegment(es, ctxt->es);
+       savesegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
+       savesegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
+       savesegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
 
        /*
         * control registers
@@ -48,10 +48,12 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context 
*ctxt)
        ctxt->cr4 = read_cr4();
 }
 
+/* Needed by apm.c */
 void save_processor_state(void)
 {
        __save_processor_state(&saved_context);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_processor_state);
 
 static void do_fpu_end(void)
 {
@@ -64,9 +66,14 @@ static void do_fpu_end(void)
 static void fix_processor_context(void)
 {
        int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-       struct tss_struct * t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
+       struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
 
-       set_tss_desc(cpu,t);    /* This just modifies memory; should not be 
necessary. But... This is necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy 
TSS or some similar stupidity. */
+       set_tss_desc(cpu, t);   /*
+                                * This just modifies memory; should not be
+                                * necessary. But... This is necessary, because
+                                * 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
+                                * similar stupidity.
+                                */
 
        load_TR_desc();                         /* This does ltr */
        load_LDT(&current->active_mm->context); /* This does lldt */
@@ -100,16 +107,16 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct 
saved_context *ctxt)
         * now restore the descriptor tables to their proper values
         * ltr is done i fix_processor_context().
         */
-       load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
-       load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+       load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
+       load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
 
        /*
         * segment registers
         */
-       loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
-       loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
-       loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
-       loadsegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
+       loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
+       loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
+       loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
+       loadsegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
 
        /*
         * sysenter MSRs
@@ -123,11 +130,9 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context 
*ctxt)
        mcheck_init(&boot_cpu_data);
 }
 
+/* Needed by apm.c */
 void restore_processor_state(void)
 {
        __restore_processor_state(&saved_context);
 }
-
-/* Needed by apm.c */
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_processor_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
-- 
1.5.4.2.316.gf7a7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to