On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > 2008/2/24, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > You know, with this new patch we probably don't need > > > > device_pm_schedule_removal() any more. > > > > > > No, we don't. However, because of that dpm_suspend() and > > device_power_down() > > > need to be changed not to assume that the removed devices will end up on > > > dpm_destroy. > > > > > > with analogous changes to dpm_suspend(). > > > > Any more suggestions for updates? > > > > Is there any current patch I should actually test - it looks there is > ongoing discussion from the time Rafael has proposed his last patch to > check by me: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14961&action=view > > But I think it's visible the only suspend update will not resolve my > problems and the problems is deeper in the mmc.
Yes, there are problems in there, but your feedback is needed nevertheless. > So should I still test yesterdays' patch ? Yes please. It will be valuable information to us whether it fixes the suspend issue at least. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
