On Thursday 28 June 2012 05:21 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Add device tree support for twl6030 usb driver.
Update the Documentation with device tree binding information.

Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kis...@ti.com>
---
  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/twlxxxx-usb.txt        |   18 ++++++++
  drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c                      |   45 ++++++++++++++------
  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/twlxxxx-usb.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/twlxxxx-usb.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/twlxxxx-usb.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f293271
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/twlxxxx-usb.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+USB COMPARATOR OF TWL CHIPS
+
+TWL6030 USB COMPARATOR
+ - compatible : Should be "ti,twl6030-usb"
+ - interrupts : Two interrupt numbers to the cpu should be specified. First
+   interrupt number is the otg interrupt number that raises ID interrupts when
+   the controller has to act as host and the second interrupt number is the
+   usb interrupt number that raises VBUS interrupts when the controller has to
+   act as device
+ - regulator :<supply-name>  can be "vusb" or "ldousb"
+ -<supply-name>-supply : phandle to the regulator device tree node
+
+twl6030-usb {
+       compatible = "ti,twl6030-usb";
+       interrupts =<  4 10>;
+       regulator = "vusb";
+       vusb-supply =<&vusb>;

This doesn't seem right. Why do you ned a 'regulator' string along
with the phandle?

+};
diff --git a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
index 6a361d2..20b7abe 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct twl6030_usb {
        u8                      asleep;
        bool                    irq_enabled;
        bool                    vbus_enable;
-       unsigned long           features;
+       const char              *regulator;
  };

  #define       comparator_to_twl(x) container_of((x), struct twl6030_usb, 
comparator)
@@ -153,13 +153,6 @@ static int twl6030_start_srp(struct phy_companion 
*comparator)

  static int twl6030_usb_ldo_init(struct twl6030_usb *twl)
  {
-       char *regulator_name;
-
-       if (twl->features&  TWL6025_SUBCLASS)
-               regulator_name = "ldousb";
-       else
-               regulator_name = "vusb";
-
        /* Set to OTG_REV 1.3 and turn on the ID_WAKEUP_COMP */
        twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL6030_MODULE_ID0 , 0x1, TWL6030_BACKUP_REG);

@@ -169,7 +162,7 @@ static int twl6030_usb_ldo_init(struct twl6030_usb *twl)
        /* Program MISC2 register and set bit VUSB_IN_VBAT */
        twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL6030_MODULE_ID0 , 0x10, TWL6030_MISC2);

-       twl->usb3v3 = regulator_get(twl->dev, regulator_name);
+       twl->usb3v3 = regulator_get(twl->dev, twl->regulator);
        if (IS_ERR(twl->usb3v3))
                return -ENODEV;

@@ -324,9 +317,9 @@ static int __devinit twl6030_usb_probe(struct 
platform_device *pdev)
  {
        struct twl6030_usb      *twl;
        int                     status, err;
-       struct twl4030_usb_data *pdata;
-       struct device *dev =&pdev->dev;
-       pdata = dev->platform_data;
+       struct device_node      *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+       struct device           *dev =&pdev->dev;
+       struct twl4030_usb_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;

        twl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof *twl, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!twl)
@@ -335,13 +328,28 @@ static int __devinit twl6030_usb_probe(struct 
platform_device *pdev)
        twl->dev             =&pdev->dev;
        twl->irq1            = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
        twl->irq2            = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
-       twl->features                = pdata->features;
        twl->linkstat                = OMAP_MUSB_UNKNOWN;

        twl->comparator.set_vbus     = twl6030_set_vbus;
        twl->comparator.start_srp    = twl6030_start_srp;
        omap_usb2_set_comparator(&twl->comparator);

+       if (np) {
+               err = of_property_read_string(np, "regulator",&twl->regulator);
+               if (err<  0) {
+                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to get regulator\n");
+                       return err;
+               }

Isn't there a better way for the driver to know which supply to use instead of DT passing the supply name?

regards,
Rajendra

+       } else if (pdata) {
+               if (pdata->features&  TWL6025_SUBCLASS)
+                       twl->regulator = "ldousb";
+               else
+                       twl->regulator = "vusb";
+       } else {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "twl6030 initialized without pdata\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
        /* init spinlock for workqueue */
        spin_lock_init(&twl->lock);

@@ -403,12 +411,23 @@ static int __exit twl6030_usb_remove(struct 
platform_device *pdev)
        return 0;
  }

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static const struct of_device_id twl6030_usb_id_table[] = {
+       { .compatible = "ti,twl6030-usb" },
+       {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, twl6030_usb_id_table);
+#else
+#define twl6030_usb_id_table NULL
+#endif
+
  static struct platform_driver twl6030_usb_driver = {
        .probe          = twl6030_usb_probe,
        .remove         = __exit_p(twl6030_usb_remove),
        .driver         = {
                .name   = "twl6030_usb",
                .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
+               .of_match_table = twl6030_usb_id_table,
        },
  };


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to