>From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang <bookj...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump

Check sample type event raw_data is existed in perf.data firstly,
then invoke process_raw_event, otherwise it will coredump.

Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookj...@gmail.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-lock.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
index fd53319..4b0c230 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
@@ -860,7 +860,9 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool
*tool __used,
                return -1;
        }

-       process_raw_event(sample->raw_data, sample->cpu, sample->time, thread);
+       if (sample->raw_data)
+               process_raw_event(sample->raw_data, sample->cpu, sample->time,
+                                 thread);

        return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to