On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:30:06PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > there are some out of bound accesses in netprio cgroup. > > now before accessing the dev->priomap.priomap array,we only check > if the dev->priomap exist.and because we don't want to see > additional bound checkings in fast path, so we should make sure > that dev->priomap is null or array size of dev->priomap.priomap > is equal to max_prioidx + 1; > > and it's not needed to call extend_netdev_tabel in write_priomap, > we can only allocate the net device's priomap which we change through > net_prio.ifpriomap. > > this patch add a return value for update_netdev_tables & extend_netdev_table, > so when new_priomap is allocated failed,write_priomap will stop to access > the priomap,and return -ENOMEM back to the userspace to tell the user > what happend. > > Change From v2: > 1. protect extend_netdev_table by RTNL. > 2. when extend_netdev_table failed,call dev_put to reduce device's refcount. > > Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com> > Cc: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> > --- > net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > I still think the use of max_priomap in write_priomap is racy (please see my previous note).
Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
